LightBlog

samedi 4 juillet 2026

Is the Oura membership worth it? 5 reasons why I think it is

The new Oura Ring 5 is out, and its smaller profile is definitely turning heads among current Oura users and prospective ones, myself included. However, in addition to the $50 price increase over the Oura Ring 4, there's another cost to consider: the Oura Membership.

The Oura Membership isn't required to use the Oura Ring, but the companion app's functionality will be quite limited without it. The $5.99 membership brings a host of features to the app and unlocks a bevy of capabilities that you wouldn't otherwise get.

If you don't subscribe, you won't get all the insights that come along with it. You open the Oura app and see only three things: your readiness score, sleep score, and activity score.

For some people, this may be adequate. I don't fully utilize all the perks of the membership, and the additional insights and features that come with the Oura membership may not be worth the extra cost on top of the one-time hardware cost. That said, there are still some major reasons why I remain subscribed to Oura.

What you get with the membership

For $5.99 a month, the Oura membership provides a ton of features and additional information that you won't get without it. The features include the following, per Oura:

  • Detailed sleep analysis
  • 24/7 heart rate tracking (Daytime, Nighttime, Activity)
  • Integration with third-party health and wellness apps like Strava
  • Advanced temperature monitoring
  • Blood Oxygen Sensing (SpO2)
  • Daytime Stress
  • Dynamic activity goals with Automatic Activity Detection
  • Heart Health (Cardiovascular Age, Cardio Capacity (VO2 Max))
  • Metabolic Health (Glucose Tracking, Meals)
  • Oura Labs
  • Resilience
  • Weekly, monthly, quarterly, yearly, and anniversary reports
  • Women's Health (Cycle Insights, Pregnancy Insights)

1. Take full advantage of your ring

The Oura app Sleep metrics

(Image credit: Android Central)

It's silly to expect every Oura Ring owner to utilize every feature included in the membership, and I definitely don't. For example, none of the Women's Health features are useful for me, but I do use a number of the other features on a near-daily basis.

As someone who absolutely loathes wearing smartwatches to sleep, I've found the Oura Ring to be a vital part of my sleep routine. While you can get your sleep score without the membership, the subscription provides a deeper look into my sleep, including my sleep efficiency, restlessness, and how long it took for me to fall asleep. As someone who struggles with sleep, I find this information very useful in pinpointing ways I can improve.

Oura Ring 5 AI advisor

(Image credit: Derrek Lee / Android Central)

But beyond sleep alone, a combination of these features provides you with a comprehensive view of your overall health and wellness. The Oura Ring is so easy to wear throughout the day that it makes it easy to measure all-day heart rate, automatically track activities, and monitor potential symptoms that may indicate illness or strain on your body.

What's more, you get to try features that Oura is testing before they become fully baked into the Oura experience. The AI Advisor was one such feature that I tested before it rolled out, and it has become a core part of the Oura app.

2. Automatic activity detection is actually pretty great

Oura Ring 5 automatic activity tracking

(Image credit: Derrek Lee / Android Central)

Automatic activity detection is perhaps one of my favorite Oura Ring features and one of the most impressive. While I prefer to manually track workouts, the Oura Ring is actually very good at detecting various activities, both in and out of exercise.

As a member, you will be able to use the ring to detect and analyze various activities, such as workouts and walks. The more you manually track workouts, the more accurate the Oura Ring gets, to the point where it's pretty good at recognizing when I'm doing HIIT or Pilates.

Even better, the Oura Ring can detect more day-to-day activities and even random things like dancing and yard work — something my other wearables, such as my Garmin Venu 4 (my preferred fitness wearable), can't do. Every time I go out, I'm always surprised to see the Oura Ring detect when I was dancing and for how long.

Furthermore, when the ring detects activity, it can include heart rate data and calorie calculations, making automatic tracking a valuable asset for your daily activity and health assessment.

2. Oura Advisor check-ins

The Oura Advisor

(Image credit: Android Central)

Pretty much every tech company is diving into AI in some shape or form, and before Google introduced its Personal Health Coach, Oura launched the Advisor. With Oura Advisor, you're able to chat with the AI about your health and goals, and the AI will take what it knows about you into consideration.

What I like is that the Advisor checks in on you every so often, based on your daily activity and other metrics, to ensure you're on track. And you can even change the frequency of the Advisor's check-ins so it'll ping you weekly, daily, or somewhere in between. Furthermore, you can choose the Advisor's tone, which can be either more direct or more conversational.

Oura highlights that the Advisor is powered by a state-of-the-art large language model (LLM) and was recently enhanced with a new proprietary LLM designed for women's health. This gives Oura extensive knowledge of medical standards, research, and more, ensuring it's uniquely positioned to answer questions about your health and provide recommendations, especially with the additional context of your in-app data.

Of course, you should always take anything Oura Advisor says with a grain of salt, as it's not a medical product designed to diagnose or treat you, but I've found it gives some pretty sound advice in an easy-to-understand way.

4. Sync with third-party apps

Oura entry on Strava

(Image credit: Android Central)

Oura is great, but the ring doesn't always get all the information. Furthermore, not everyone likes wearing the ring while lifting weights, and I often track my workouts on a smartwatch. That's where third-party app integrations come in.

By connecting with Health Connect, the Oura app can pull workout data from my smartwatches and even weight data from my Withings scale to give me a full look at my day. The timeline feature helps me see my day in moments, including when I wake up, work out, and go to sleep.

Oura is basically a one-stop shop where you can get a pretty comprehensive view of your daily health and wellness, and it all contributes to your long-term health outlook.

And when I do track activities using the ring, the Oura app can send workouts to the Strava app, including location data (from the phone).

5. Oura puts its money where its products are

Oura Ring 5 next to the Oura Ring 4 and Oura Ring 4 Ceramic

(Image credit: Derrek Lee / Android Central)

Considering the benefits, I think $5.99 per month is a pretty reasonable price to pay, especially given that Oura is still a relatively new and small company. We've consistently asked why Oura has retained its subscription model when other smart ring companies have gone subscription-free, and the answer is always the same: Oura uses the membership to help improve the product.

There's a reason why Oura continues to produce the best smart rings on the market, even as the competition heats up with new players and advancements. Even Samsung felt compelled to enter the smart ring market, only to seemingly fall short of Oura, despite not charging a subscription fee.

"We really, actually feel pressure from our members to continually drive research and pioneer what the smart ring can be and invest that back into our product," Oura told us after launching the Oura Ring 4.

After seeing the growth from Oura Ring Gen 3 to Oura Ring 5, it's clear to me that Oura is doing exactly that, expanding on the value of each model by continuously adding new features throughout its lifecycle. To me, that seems well worth the $6 a month.

An alternative way to pay for the Oura Membership

If you're hesitating on buying both an Oura Ring and the membership, it may help you to know that you can purchase both using your FSA or HSA. For many, that money is just sitting there, unused, so this could give you a reason to dip into those funds.



from Latest from Android Central https://ift.tt/R1JqWDt
via IFTTT

Google Home Speaker (2026) vs. Nest Mini: Taller or smaller?

Google's Nest Mini speaker was announced alongside the Pixel 4, which should give you a good idea of how old the speaker is at this point. While smart home speakers were never designed to be updated annually the way phones are, the Nest Mini's hardware is showing its age in the Gemini era. Most commands take a notable amount of time to process, and since the audio quality was never top-tier to begin with, it's likely you're considering an upgrade by this point, anyway.

That's where the Google Home Speaker comes in. Google has dropped the Nest name for its latest speaker, going all-in on Gemini integration and a powerful new speaker system. At $99, it's twice the price of the Nest Mini when it launched, and while it's certainly an excellent upgrade for every Nest Mini owner, there might still be a few reasons to keep that Nest Mini in the right room.

Google Home Speaker (2026) vs. Nest Mini: Design

Nest Mini hanging on a wall

(Image credit: Android Central)

My favorite Nest Mini feature was, undoubtedly, the mounting hole on the back. This ingenious little dimple lets it be hung on any wall, discreetly adding a speaker to any room you want. Whether you had the cord hanging freely (as in the picture above) or you got more professional with it and hid it, the Nest Mini was a great addition to any room.

The Google Home Speaker doesn't have this mounting hole, so it's not easy to hang on a wall, but it's a great addition to any shelf or nightstand thanks to its homey texture and colors. It uses a similar textile look to the Nest Mini, plus the same LED volume adjustment buttons on top and a thick rubber nonstick pad on the bottom to keep it from sliding or being bumped around.

The glowing LED array on the underside of the Google Home Speaker

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

You'll also find a hardware mute switch on the bottom of both speakers, so you can feel confident in your privacy if you just want these to act as speakers (and not a Gemini-powered assistant).

While talking to the Nest Mini, an array of LEDs lights up on top to let you know it's listening or processing a command. The Google Home Speaker spruces this up a bit with an LED ring on the bottom, which features a unique glow that's more obvious than the Nest Mini, which is particularly important since it tends to blend in well with decor on shelves.

Google Nest Mini speaker on a blue backdrop

(Image credit: Android Central)

Both speakers feature poor choices for power cabling, which is more than just annoying. The Nest Mini featured a proprietary barrel plug, which meant you needed to buy a new charger if something happened to it. The Google Home Speaker uses a USB-C charging brick, but the cable is hardwired into the speaker, so you'll likely have to buy a whole new one if something happens to this one.

Both wires are about the same length (~6.5 ft), and since they're either proprietary or non-replaceable, you'll have to choose a location close to an outlet or extension cord.

Google Home Speaker (2026) vs. Nest Mini: Sound quality and connectivity

A Jade Google Home Speaker nestled into a bookshelf

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

Although Nest Mini's sound quality was an improvement over the original Google Home Mini speaker, neither model offered stellar sound. They were simply too small for that. The Google Home Speaker substantially upgrades the audio quality this time around, and it does so without drastically altering the speaker's footprint.

That's because, while the Google Home Speaker is about twice as high as the Nest Mini speaker (42mm vs 86mm), it's also about the same diameter (96mm vs 106mm). That's a very easy size to stuff into a bookshelf or a similarly small space (as evidenced in the photo above).

The Google Home Speaker also features an omnidirectional 58mm full-range audio driver, delivering 360-degree audio that sounds great no matter where the "front" of the speaker is. Nest Mini features a similar 360-degree design, but the 40mm driver and substantially lighter weight (181g vs 408g) mean the Google Home Speaker's bass quality simply sounds better.

Setting up a Google Home Speaker as a surround sound speaker system for a Google TV Streamer

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

Both speakers support the Google Cast protocol and multi-room speaker capability, so you can cast nearly any audio source to them, but the Google Home Speaker supports Google's new surround sound mode. That lets you connect multiple Google Home speakers to your Google TV streamer for surround sound while watching TV, giving you a great way to ditch the soundbar (or an older wired audio system) for something chicer.

The Google Home Speaker also supports faster wireless connectivity via Wi-Fi 6 (Nest Mini is Wi-Fi 5), better Bluetooth quality via Bluetooth 5.4 (vs Bluetooth 5.0 on Nest Mini), and full support as a Thread hub for Matter connectivity.

That last part ensures that the Google Home Speaker is a better choice for smart home connectivity, as it allows newer smart home devices to connect through a local Thread network for faster local commands.

Google Home Speaker (2026) vs. Nest Mini: AI capabilties and specs

The mute button and amber LEDs on the underside of the Google Home Speaker

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

Nest Mini was launched as a mostly cloud-centric computing device, often offloading even the most basic commands to Google Assistant in the cloud. Over time, as Google has migrated many commands to Gemini, Nest Mini has started to feel slower and slower.

The Google Home Speaker was built to help fix this problem, but it doesn't do it quite as well as I had hoped. The newer 2.0GHz CPU with a built-in NPU is designed to process more tasks and commands locally, but my experience with the speaker has shown that Google still offloads many commands to the cloud.

Google Home Speaker (2026) vs Nest Mini specs

Category

Google Home Speaker

Nest Mini

Speaker

Omni-directional 58mm full-range driver

360-degree sound with 40mm driver

Microphone

3 far-field mics,
hardware mute switch

3 far-field mics,
hardware mute switch

Dimensions

86.6mm/3.4in high x 107mm/4.2in diameter

42mm/1.65in high x 98mm/3.85mm diameter

Weight

396g

181g

Power adapter

30W USB-C PC/PPS charger

15W barrel plug adapter

RAM

1GB LPDDR4

1GB RAM

Storage

4GB EMMC

4GB EMMC

Processor

Quad-core A55 2.0 GHz with NPU

Quad-core A53 1.4Ghz with ML hardware engine

Connectivity

Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.4, Thread 1.3 border router (2.4GHz), Matter, Google Cast

Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.0, Google Cast

Colors

Globally: Hazel, Porcelain

U.S. exclusive: Jade, Berry

Chalk, Charcoal, Coral, Sky

This results in a speaker that executes many commands fast (and some near instantly), but some commands are still absurdly slow. Even simple commands, like setting a timer, might take 20 seconds or more to execute if something goes awry. While this is likely just a bug happening with the Google Home Speaker at launch, it still shows that Google isn't keeping as many commands local as I'd like.

Since both devices support Gemini, there's no functional difference in these speakers' ability to use Google's AI-powered assistant. The difference is mainly down to speed, something I hope Google will continue to improve and tweak in the new speaker with future software updates.

Google Home Speaker (2026) vs. Nest Mini: Which should you buy?

A Jade Google Home Speaker on a table

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

While newer isn't always better (especially when it's double the price), Google no longer sells the Nest Mini. You could always pick up a second-hand unit on eBay and try your luck, especially if you just want a little speaker to hang on a wall.

Otherwise, the Google Home Speaker is an easy choice. It's got substantially better audio quality, support for Matter and Thread, Wi-Fi 6, newer Bluetooth for better audio quality, surround sound support with Google TV Streamers, and a better processor for faster smart home and Gemini queries.



from Latest from Android Central https://ift.tt/OtGyr7l
via IFTTT

I tested the Oura Ring 5 for a month, and it's exactly what other smart rings should aspire to be

It's been less than two years since I reviewed the Oura Ring 4, so I was surprised to learn that the Oura Ring 5 was coming so soon. After all, we went roughly three years between the launch of the Oura Ring Gen 3 and the Oura Ring 4.

But while I expected the Oura Ring 5 to simply be a refresh, the updated design really proves it's something of a generational leap over the Oura Ring 4. In fact, with the smaller profile, long battery life, and other notable upgrades, the Oura Ring 5 feels like the smart ring that all other rings should strive to be.

Category

Oura Ring 5

Materials

High-performance titanium exterior, titanium interior

Protection

IP68

Water resistant at a depth of 100m/328ft

Sensors

Red, green, and infrared LEDs (heart rate, blood oxygen)

Digital temperature sensor

Accelerometer

Battery

6-9 days, up to 80-minute charge time

Connectivity

Bluetooth 5.0 LE

Platform support

iOS (Apple Health), Android (Health Connect)

Dimensions

Width: 6.09mm

Thickness: 2.28mm

Weight

2g+ (depending on size)

Sizes

6-13

Colors

Silver, Black, Stealth, Brushed Silver, Gold, Deep Rose

Holding the Oura Ring 5

(Image credit: Derrek Lee / Android Central)

At first glance, the Oura Ring 5 looks a bit smaller than the Oura Ring 4, but you don't really get the full effect until you hold it in your hand. At just over 2 grams for my size 11, the Oura Ring 5 is surprisingly light. It honestly feels like a regular ring in the hand, unlike previous generations, which had a little heft.

Not only that, but the ring is surprisingly small, and if you're coming from the Oura Ring 4 (and especially the Oura Ring 4 Ceramic), then you'll definitely notice the difference. The narrower width helps the Oura Ring 5 blend in with the rest of your jewelry, making it look like a regular ring rather than a smart tracker.

I can see this going a long way towards popularizing wearable tech, as a major problem users had with previous Oura smart rings was their size. I didn't mind the size of the previous models, but now that I've used the Oura Ring 5, I can't imagine going back to anything bigger.

Oura Ring 5 on top of the Oura Ring 4

Oura Ring 5 (right) on top of the Oura Ring 4 (left). (Image credit: Derrek Lee / Android Central)

The ring is also thinner than previous models, and that's great for multiple reasons. Firstly, it makes it less noticeable in general, especially when carrying things or lifting weights. That last part is especially important because the ring doesn't protrude as much, so there's less concern about scuffing it against items like dumbbells in your hands.

Secondly, the thinner profile makes it even better to throw on a cover without worrying about adding too much thickness. Oura still doesn't make first-party cases, so I continue to use third-party covers I find on Amazon when I work out. I notice that the ring doesn't appear to scuff and scratch as easily as previous models, but it's not immune, so a cover helps keep it as pristine as possible.

Wearing the Oura Ring 5 while holding a dumbbell

(Image credit: Derrek Lee / Android Central)

One thing that surprises me about the Oura Ring 5 is the battery life. Despite being 40% smaller than the Oura Ring 4, the latest model offers better battery life. Oura says it should last from six to nine days per charge, which is in line with my use.

When I began tracking the battery life, the Oura Ring 5 was at full charge on Monday morning, and I didn't need to charge it until the following Wednesday. This included several days of manual and automatic workout tracking, as well as daily sleep tracking, with 8% battery life left to spare.

Oura Ring 5 next to the Oura Ring 4 and Oura Ring 4 Ceramic

Oura Ring 5 (right) next to the Oura Ring 4 (left) and Oura Ring 4 Ceramic (top). (Image credit: Derrek Lee / Android Central)

Speaking of tracking, the Oura Ring 5 still provides detailed health monitoring, especially for sleep. I've noticed that the heart rate data is much more consistent when tracking things like sleep or activities, whereas previous models would often have many gaps or fail to gather heart rate data altogether, particularly during workouts.

That said, workouts are the only area where the Oura Ring 5 falls a bit short. When tracking high-intensity exercise, I notice that the Oura Ring 5's heart rate data is often much lower than that of other wearables I've used, such as the Garmin Venu 4 and Fitbit Air. I don't notice this same deviation when at rest, as the live heart rate data lines up with the Garmin Venu 4 and Fitbit Air, but the Oura Ring 5, like its predecessors, shouldn't be relied on as a workout device.

(Image credit: Android Central)

That's actually not too surprising to me; the Oura Ring is more of a passive health tracker than an active fitness monitor. Fortunately, Oura has added the ability to connect another device to the app as a live heart rate source. You can use a dedicated heart rate monitor or even a smartwatch to see live heart rate data during your exercise, along with distance and pace (via location data from your phone).

Fortunately, the step count seems improved, despite this being an area that smart rings struggle with. I tracked a 5,000-step walk between the Oura Ring 5, Garmin Venu 4, and Fitbit Air, and while the ring had the largest deviation, it was only 15 steps off, which is pretty good.

Device

Step count

Oura Ring 5

4,985

Garmin Venu 4

4,996

Fitbit Air

5,004

One area where the Oura Ring 5 excels is automatic activity tracking. The ring can pretty accurately determine when I'm doing certain activities without me having to manually track them. That includes walks, runs, and even more varied activities, like yard work and dancing. I continue to be impressed every time I check my phone after a night out and see the ring asking me to confirm I was dancing.

Oura Ring 5 automatic activity tracking

(Image credit: Derrek Lee / Android Central)

As for the app experience itself, it's very visual, with a customizable set of focus metrics at the top. These shortcuts make it easy to dig into your sleep, activities, stress, and more. You can even track your weight either via manual logging or syncing to third-party apps like Withings, and the app will show your weekly, monthly, and yearly trends.

The Today view dynamically changes, showing the most important metrics at the top, such as your sleep score when you wake up and your steps toward the end of the day. You can also view a timeline of your activities toward the bottom, which also shows tracked activities or synced workouts from other apps.

The Vitals tab shows daily measurements, while the Health tab gives you a more long-term look at your health trends. From the + button, you can access quick actions, where you can start an activity, begin an unguided meditation session, or even log meals. The meal-logging tool is actually pretty neat, as Oura can fairly accurately analyze what you're eating from a photo and provide nutritional and meal-timing insights to help with things like regulating hunger and cutting down on snacking.

Oura Ring 5 next to a phone with the Oura app

(Image credit: Derrek Lee / Android Central)

Throughout the app, Oura Members also have access to the Oura Advisor, an AI chatbot that focuses on health and wellness. You can trigger it using the + button for general questions, or within each major metric, like sleep and activity, for more specific conversations about recent changes and updates.

Unlike Google's new AI-focused Google Health app, which often feels like an overload of information, Oura's insights are light throughout the app, allowing users to tap Advisor to learn more. When chatting with the Advisor, you can ask it about your metrics or general health questions, and it will tap into its health-focused large language model (LLM), which "draws from a broad foundation of established medical standards, research, and knowledge sources," to provide relevant and contextual responses.

One of my favorite aspects of the Advisor is how it checks in with me every so often, based on recent activities and more. You can even change the tone of the Advisor's responses and how often it checks in, which adds a nice bit of customization.

Oura Ring 5 AI advisor

(Image credit: Derrek Lee / Android Central)

One new feature for Android phones is Locate, which I've been asking for for years. With it, Oura Ring 5 owners can know where their ring was when it last connected to their phone, which can provide a good starting place for where to search. If you're within range, the app will let you know when you're getting close to the ring.

Since the ring doesn't have built-in GPS, ultra-wideband (UWB), or Bluetooth 6, the app won't give you precise tracking, so you'll have to rely on the app's proximity clues and do a bit of the work yourself. Still, it's a lot better than nothing, and will hopefully keep me from losing a third Oura Ring model.

Oura Ring 5 ring size and sensors

(Image credit: Derrek Lee / Android Central)

Of course, nearly all of these features are available only via the Oura Membership, a monthly (or yearly, if you prefer) subscription that provides access to the ring's most useful features and insights. Many people are still unhappy to learn that the Oura app basically requires a subscription to be truly useful, but I do think it's well worth the cost, especially given how Oura has continuously improved its products over the years and consistently produces the best smart ring on the market.

And that's exactly what the Oura Ring 5 is. The Oura Ring 5 is what other smart rings should strive to be: slim, light, and practically invisible while keeping your health and wellness in check. Starting at $399, it's not cheap, and the membership is still a point of contention for some, but Oura proves that smart wearable tech can truly blend in.



from Latest from Android Central https://ift.tt/rGlUxvc
via IFTTT

I upgraded to the new Google Home Speaker for the AI, but I'm keeping it for the sound

Google is relaunching its smart speaker ecosystem for the "Gemini era," as it has stated so many times with recent products. While I'm not fully convinced this new speaker is a truly revolutionary Gemini-powered speaker when compared to existing Google and Nest speakers, the overall quality of the Google Home Speaker is a great value for $99.

Whether you're looking for a new music-playing speaker that understands basic commands or want an extra speaker to enhance your smart home, this is a solid choice with some annoying software issues that will hopefully be cleared up in the near future.

Google Home Speaker price, availability, and specs

A Jade Google Home Speaker nestled into a bookshelf

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

The 2026 Google Home Speaker is the first smart speaker from Google that's designed "from the ground up for Gemini." It's the first Google speaker to include a proper NPU for AI processing, an upgrade over ML processors in the past few Nest releases. It retails for $99 and comes in two colors globally — Hazel and Porcelain — while U.S. customers can also choose from Berry or Jade varieties. My review unit is Jade.

Google includes 6 months of Google Home Premium for free (a $60 value) when you purchase a Google Home Speaker before September 30, 2026.

Google Home Speaker (2026) specs

Catrgory

Google Home Speaker

Speaker

Omni-directional 58mm full-range driver

Microphone

3 far-field mics,
hardware mute switch

Dimensions

86.6mm/3.4in high x 107mm/4.2in diameter

Weight

396g

Power adapter

30W USB-C PC/PPS charger

RAM

1GB LPDDR4

Storage

4GB EMMC

Processor

Quad-core A55 2.0 GHz with NPU

Connectivity

Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.4, Thread 1.3 border router (2.4GHz), Matter

Colors

Globally: Hazel, Porcelain

U.S. exclusive: Jade, Berry

Mostly the right priorities

Holding the Jade Google Home Speaker

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

For the past few years, Google has used the Nest brand name for its smart speakers, but I've rarely called them that. Whether it's the Nest Mini or one of the Nest Hub smart displays, my household always refers to them audibly as the Google speaker or the Google display.

Because of that, I think it makes a lot more sense to keep using the Google name as the proper brand, and I know I'm not the only person who calls their smart speaker "Google" something or other. Thankfully, Google rectified the name without ruining the excellent design and the sort of feng shui character of the Nest line of smart speakers.

The glowing LED array on the underside of the Google Home Speaker

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

The 2026 speaker is still clad in homey fabric that looks graceful and unobtrusive on a shelf. It's the ideal size between the tiny Nest Mini and the gargantuan Google Home Max speaker, with appropriately sized audio components. It's even got a cute little glowing light underneath that makes it feel more like you're talking to a smart little robot than mumbling into a speaker.

But I don't understand why Google speakers seem to almost always have some weird issue with the power cables. Earlier models used barrel plugs and proprietary chargers, creating unnecessary e-waste. This model uses a standard 30W Google USB-C charger, but the cable is hardwired into the speaker, meaning you'll either have to splice it when it eventually breaks or toss the speaker and buy a new one. Dumb.

The underside of the Jade Google Home Speaker
Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central
The non-removable power cable and mute button on the underside of the Jade Google Home Speaker
Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central
The volume adjustment buttons with lit LEDs on the Google Home Speaker
Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central
The mute button and amber LEDs on the underside of the Google Home Speaker
Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central

Since it's slightly smaller than the Nest Audio speaker (yes, there have been a lot of options over the years), the audio quality won't be quite as good, but the Google Home Speaker's advantage is that its speaker is omnidirectional. Depending on how you want to mount it, this could make a big difference.

You can also use the Google Home Speaker in conjunction with a Google TV Streamer to create a surround sound setup, which is a great feature I'm glad Google finally adopted from Amazon Echo and Fire TV devices.

I'm not exactly an audiophile and don't care much about top-notch sound, so I found these speakers ideal, as they're a notable upgrade over the Nest Minis I have around the house. Nest Audio fans should stick with those unless they have issues with using Gemini.

Setting up a Google Home Speaker as a surround sound speaker system for a Google TV Streamer

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

And while "built for Gemini" should be the actual upgrade for the Google Home Speaker over any other Nest or Google speaker, my experience with it has been extremely inconsistent. If I ask it to turn the lights on or off, check my cameras, or even what the weather will be like next week, responses generally take about 1 second to process. This is much faster than the other Google speakers in my house, for the most part.

But some commands are bizarrely slow. Setting a timer, for example, often takes 20-25 seconds of processing time before I receive an "OK, setting a timer" response. Asking it to add bananas to my grocery list also takes 5-10 seconds. This bizarre behavior persists through reboots, so I don't know what to make of it. Clearly, the speaker isn't doing as much local processing for simple commands like this as I had hoped. Google is aware of the issues (as I'm not the only one experiencing them), and I will update this review if they are resolved.

This is particularly annoying because all of the other features I've used over the past week have been great. Gemini allows you to chain multiple commands together or even express complex commands, while Assistant can only do one at a time. For example, you can ask it to "turn off all lights except for the bedroom light," a command I issue nightly as I tuck in for reading time.

All the options available in the Google Home app for the Google Home Speaker
Android Central
All the options available in the Google Home app for the Google Home Speaker
Android Central

This isn't particularly unique to this new speaker since Gemini has been rolled out to even the oldest 2016 Google Home speaker (which is still in operation in my house), but this speaker is certainly going to be supported for years to come, while those older speakers will eventually receive an end-of-life update.

At some point, Google had locked down several features behind the annoying Voice Match feature. I don't want to use Voice Match, but I (and others in my house) do want to check my calendar, and Google finally allows users to do that on its smart speakers.

This speaker also seems to actually understand commands, including simple ones like "stop" when a timer is going off, while I swear half my other speakers ignore my commands half the time. Maybe time will also turn this one into a pretty paperweight, but it's pretty great for the time being.

Should you buy it?

The Jade Google Home Speaker

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

The 2026 Google Home Speaker is a generally good little product that delivers great audio quality in a compelling design, with a virtual assistant that seems to actually understand you. Processing time is strangely lengthy for some simple commands (like setting a timer), but this is almost certainly a bug rather than a product defect.

If Google can reduce processing time for some commands, this will be my go-to speaker recommendation for the future. Gemini has been excellent for smart home commands in my experience, and far more understanding of every other type of command than Assistant has been for the past half-decade, and that's really all I want out of a smart speaker, anyway.



from Latest from Android Central https://ift.tt/sDumtzS
via IFTTT

Prime Day is done, but this best-selling 4K projector is still at its lowest price

I tested all the projectors XGIMI released in the last five years, and there's no doubt in my mind that the Horizon 20 Max is the best of the lot. I want to highlight three areas where the projector has a clear advantage: lens shift with optical zoom, bright projection, and a built-in gimbal.

Lens shift in particular is a game-changer, as it basically allows me to position the Horizon 20 Max anywhere, and adjust the projection as needed. I used the projector with a 100-inch ALR panel, and setting it up with the screen was so easy that it just took a matter of minutes. I previously used the XGIMI Aura UST projector mostly because it was just easier to set up — I didn't want to bother mounting a long-throw projector — but with the Horizon 20 Max, I just put it on a nightstand, and the projector automatically adjusted the image scaling.

XGIMI Horizon 20 Max 4K laser projector on a 100-inch ALR panel

(Image credit: Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central)

Optical zoom also plays a big part in this, and the Horizon 20 Max has an adjustable throw range of 1.2–1.5:1, giving you much better flexibility on where to position the projector. Honestly, with these two features, you don't have to deal with any of the usual hassles involved in setting up a long-throw projector. The best part? The Horizon 20 Max is once again down to $2,199, its lowest price. The projector usually goes for around $2,699, but with the Fourth of July celebration, you can buy it for much less.

The Horizon 20 Max projects a bright image, is effortless to set up in a medium or large room, and has the best image quality in its class. If you're interested in a home theater and want a long-throw projector you can use throughout the day, this is now my go-to recommendation. View Deal

The design of the Horizon 20 Max is similar to its predecessor, the Horizon S Max. There are a few changes to the color scheme, and the 20 Max doesn't quite attract as much attention, which is a good thing. What I like the most is that XGIMI retained the gimbal system, and that makes it easy to orient the projector to your preferences. This is a key advantage over the Valerion VisionMaster Pro 2, and it is so convenient that I don't want to use a projector that isn't mounted on a swiveling base.

You get the usual connectivity; there are dual HDMI ports (with one eARC), optical and 3.5mm out, and USB-A ports if you want to attach an external drive. The projector uses Wi-Fi 6, and I didn't see any issues with connectivity in the six months I used it. Coming to the internals, it's powered by the reliable MediaTek MT9679 platform, and has 4GB of RAM alongside 128GB of built-in storage. The 4GB of RAM is absolutely needed to ensure the Google TV interface is lag-free, and thankfully, there are no problems in that area.

XGIMI Horizon 20 Max 4K laser projector
Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central
XGIMI Horizon 20 Max 4K laser projector
Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central
XGIMI Horizon 20 Max 4K laser projector
Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central
XGIMI Horizon 20 Max 4K laser projector
Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central

The projector gets two 12W audio drivers, and there's Dolby Digital Plus, DTS-Virtual: X, and DTS-HD. I'd recommend using a dedicated soundbar to make the most of the projector, but if that isn't doable, the built-in sound is decent enough.

Where the Horizon 20 Max truly shines is the projection; it delivers up to 5,700 lumens, and in real-world use, you can easily get over 3,500 lumens, making it one of the brightest projectors in this category. It's noticeably brighter than the Horizon S Max, Valerion VisionMaster Pro 2, and even the VisionMaster Max. Why is this relevant? If you don't have a dark room, you can still use the 20 Max during the day and not get washed-out colors, which is a problem with projectors that don't get as bright.

XGIMI Horizon 20 Max 4K laser projector on a 100-inch ALR panel
Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central
XGIMI Horizon 20 Max 4K laser projector on a 100-inch ALR panel
Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central
XGIMI Horizon 20 Max 4K laser projector on a 100-inch ALR panel
Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central
XGIMI Horizon 20 Max 4K laser projector on a 100-inch ALR panel
Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central

Colors are vibrant, and there's a noticeable difference between the 20 Max and the Horizon S Max in this area, particularly when it comes to HDR content. I also like that there's a dedicated game mode that works really well with the PS5. The 20 Max gets Dolby Vision and IMAX Enhanced, and while you miss out on the unique Dynamic Black Level feature — which boosts black levels — when using Dolby Vision, it isn't a huge omission.

The 20 Max uses pixel shifting to deliver a 4K resolution, and it goes up to 300 inches. Valerion's VisionMaster Max is the closest rival, and the 20 Max does a better job with auto keystone correction, overall brightness levels, screen alignment, and the ability to adjust color balance based on the wall color — this makes a huge difference if you're not using a dedicated screen. You get the standard Google TV interface, and while I'm not a fan of the UI, I didn't have any problems with lag.

On the whole, the Horizon 20 Max is the best 4K long-throw projector I used. While it had its share of bugs at launch, XGIMI did a good job addressing most of these with software updates over the last six months, and after extensive testing, I'm confident in my recommendation of this projector. If you need a bright 4K long-throw projector with standout colors and easy configurability, the 20 Max is the one to get, and coming in at $2,199, it is an unmissable deal in this category.



from Latest from Android Central https://ift.tt/trkwULF
via IFTTT

vendredi 3 juillet 2026

This exclusive T-Mobile deal gets you a powerful Samsung tablet for only $99 — but you're running out of time

Whether you're on the road or on the couch, tablets have become essential devices in today's world. They can also cost a pretty penny without a good deal attached, which is where companies like T-Mobile come in.

This weekend only, the iconic wireless provider will give you the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G for only $99 when you add a line with an eligible data plan on its website. That's a straight $500.99 discount, no trade-in required.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G 128GB: $599.99 $99.99 with Tablet Unlimited Plus or higher at T-Mobile

In the market for a new couch companion? The Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G is an excellent choice, and now T-Mobile will give you the 'Fan Edition' tablet for only $99 when you add a line with the Tablet Unlimited Plus plan (or higher). The exclusive offer expires on July 8th, however, so don't wait too long to make your move. View Deal

The Galaxy Tab S10 FE is designated a "Fan Edition" tablet because it takes the most popular features of more-expensive Samsung tablets and loads them onto a versatile, midrange package that should please just about everyone. Straight out of the box, you get a vibrant 10.9-inch 90Hz display with an included S Pen stylus that magnetically connects to the side of the tablet. The Tab S10 FE also boasts a sturdy aluminum build with IP68 water-and-dust resistance, which is rare for a tablet in this price range.

Under the hood, the Galaxy Tab S10 FE is powered by an efficient Exynos chipset with 12GB of RAM, plus you get a 12MP front-facing camera, expandable storage up to 2TB using microSD, and a large 8,000mAh battery should easily last a full day on a single charge.

Sure, there are more powerful Samsung tablets out there, but the Galaxy Tab S10 FE is a reliable, balanced choice for users who don't want to break the bank. This $500 discount from T-Mobile is just the cherry on top.

So what's the catch?

Like I mentioned above, you'll need to sign up for the Tablet Unlimited Plus plan (or higher) to enjoy the $500.99 in savings over 24 months. These data plans start at $25 per month using AutoPay, which you probably would've paid anyway if you plan to connect the tablet to a wireless network. You'll also need to cover a $35 activation fee and any applicable sales tax.

T-Mobile's Tablet Unlimited Plus plan gives you unlimited high-speed data every month, plus 15GB of mobile hotspot data, HD video streaming, and unlimited texting with 5GB of data in over 215 countries around the globe.



from Latest from Android Central https://ift.tt/7OsIGm2
via IFTTT

Google Home Speaker has a problem: users report incredibly slow response times

What you need to know

  • Google Home Speaker users have reported a glaring issue: their device's assistance has become incredibly sluggish.
  • Other users have experienced the same; however, this latency problem appears to affect more than the Home Speaker, as other Nest devices struggle, too.
  • Google has responded to this thread, stating a fix is being worked on "ASAP."

Google's latest smart speaker got off to a fast start, but users are reporting anything but good news, as problems emerge.

Earlier this week, reports surfaced on the Google Home subreddit from a user with a Home Speaker (via Android Police). The root of their report is that their Home Speaker has weirdly become sluggish. They say that the "First day all was smooth... the second day every single question (even 'hello') needs at least 30s of answer time." Troubleshooting provided no such relief from this issue.

Users started flowing into the thread, stating that others with the Home Speaker are having the same problem. The publication spotted another thread from a user that blows this problem wide open. It's not just a Home Speaker issue, but rather a Google smart home issue that's affecting a range of its products. The user says, "Everything is timing out."

They add that their smart home devices are all struggling with delayed or sluggish response times. Resetting has seemingly offered no aid in solving the issue. One user said, "Definitely noticed this since the update. Especially for simpler tasks which used to be snappier, eg turn on the light, change to warm white, set 50%." A subsequent report says they haven't noticed anything timed out, but rather their streamed content (like music) is stopping midway.

Google has become aware of this smart home problem. A community member says the company is "working on a fix ASAP." There's no clear timeframe for when we could see this, so users will have to tough it out as best as possible.

Updates were made to do the opposite

Google Home Speaker lifestyle image

(Image credit: Google)
Android Central's Take

It's a bit strange to see issues surface for something Google has tried to make faster. It's like being caught in the strangest whirlwind. An update will likely be required to solve this problem, the only thing is when will we see it?

It's interesting to see users bring up the fact that the Home Speaker "used to be" snappy with its response times for mundane tasks. Google rolled out an update for Gemini's home assistance in March, quickening its responses by ~30% to ~40%. This patch reduced the latency between the user giving the task and Gemini responding to it/following it.

Google's smart speakers were brought into the spotlight a week ago, as the company fixed a long-standing SiriusXM radio problem. Users had been receiving errors with SiriusXM on their smart speaker, stating, "I looked for that, but it either isn't available or can't be played right now." SiriusXM would work via the user's phone, just not on Google's smart home devices. All is seemingly well now after Google's patch.



from Latest from Android Central https://ift.tt/crwvoFU
via IFTTT